恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「成員:SaigonSarang/note」
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) n空固𥿂略𢯢𢷮 |
空固𥿂略𢯢𢷮 |
||
| 𣳔1： | 𣳔1： | ||
==Nom need to be discussed== | ==Nom need to be discussed== | ||
| 𣳔31： | 𣳔26： | ||
I'd also disagree with your view of 'richness'. Certainly, the English language did not diminish in richness since Shakespeare's time, despite the fact that English spelling variants were very common back then. In fact, it was one of the contributors to mass literacy of English, and increased the frequency of literary compositions in the English language, allowing more wonderful additions to the existing body of literature. The more minds that can read and write in Nom, the more chance that you'll procure a literary genius, and it is the work of these geniuses that contribute to the diversity of the language, wouldn't you agree? | I'd also disagree with your view of 'richness'. Certainly, the English language did not diminish in richness since Shakespeare's time, despite the fact that English spelling variants were very common back then. In fact, it was one of the contributors to mass literacy of English, and increased the frequency of literary compositions in the English language, allowing more wonderful additions to the existing body of literature. The more minds that can read and write in Nom, the more chance that you'll procure a literary genius, and it is the work of these geniuses that contribute to the diversity of the language, wouldn't you agree? | ||
November 13 at 12:49pm [https://www.facebook.com/groups/227657444504/permalink/10152204607564505/] | November 13 at 12:49pm [https://www.facebook.com/groups/227657444504/permalink/10152204607564505/] | ||
==ㄚㄅㄠㄊ== | |||
Hello! | |||
面黒主義で変態志向·哲人志向の中國系東亜人による、鍵語は「愛と自由」「エロかわ」「花鳥風月」「酸甜苦辣鹹」「越境·脱禁忌·脱構築」☆東亜·中華·扶桑·高麗·安南を楽しむQ。東亜内外の美♀、論客、皮肉屋、煽り屋、愉快犯ども大歓迎。お子CHAMAとU^_^Uは入場禁止。 | |||
番版𣅶11:45、𣈜11𣎃3𢆥2014
Nom need to be discussed
Should simplified components be adopted in Standard Chunom?
1. ALL simplified Chunom components (usually a Chuhan or a part of a Chuhan) should be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁵; môn (鍆 钔)→钔 ...】
2. SOME frequently used simplified Chunom components with reasonable simplification should be adopted as part of a Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】
3. Simplified Chunom components should NEVER be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→瀧; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】
Why Standardization
Wang XM: I'd like to kindly remind you of the title of this group, and the vision of many of its associated groups. This group is not about keeping Nom limited to a dead writing system studied "simply out of scholarly curiosity". It is about eventually restoring Nom's former status, at least as a serious, modern, legitimate alternative writing system for the Vietnamese language. A writing system cannot seriously gain official status unless it is standardised; no modern country with its own national language has gone without spelling reform.
I'd also disagree with your view of 'richness'. Certainly, the English language did not diminish in richness since Shakespeare's time, despite the fact that English spelling variants were very common back then. In fact, it was one of the contributors to mass literacy of English, and increased the frequency of literary compositions in the English language, allowing more wonderful additions to the existing body of literature. The more minds that can read and write in Nom, the more chance that you'll procure a literary genius, and it is the work of these geniuses that contribute to the diversity of the language, wouldn't you agree? November 13 at 12:49pm [1]
ㄚㄅㄠㄊ
Hello!
面黒主義で変態志向·哲人志向の中國系東亜人による、鍵語は「愛と自由」「エロかわ」「花鳥風月」「酸甜苦辣鹹」「越境·脱禁忌·脱構築」☆東亜·中華·扶桑·高麗·安南を楽しむQ。東亜内外の美♀、論客、皮肉屋、煽り屋、愉快犯ども大歓迎。お子CHAMAとU^_^Uは入場禁止。