Anonymous user
恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「討論準化:Cái」
→References
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) |
|||
| （空顯示8番版𧵑5𠊛用於𡧲） | |||
| 𣳔1： | 𣳔1： | ||
=Cái¹= | |||
{{cxd-t}} | {{cxd-t}} | ||
=={{discussion}}== | =={{discussion}}== | ||
* '''丐''' | |||
# ''[http://www.chunom.org/pages/genibrel/#61 Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Génibrel, J.F.M., 1898]'' uses this character for this meaning. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 16:06、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT) | |||
# 丐 is ok - [[成員:Congdantoancau|Trần Viễn Fiơng]] ([[討論‐成員:Congdantoancau|討論]]) 16:30、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT) | |||
* '''個'''（亇 个） | |||
=Cái²= | |||
{{cxd-t}} | |||
=={{discussion}}== | |||
* '''丐''' | |||
* '''個'''（亇 个） | |||
# ''[http://www.chunom.org/pages/genibrel/#61 Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Génibrel, J.F.M., 1898]'' uses this character for this meaning. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 16:06、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT) | |||
# “個” is evident - [[成員:Congdantoancau|Trần Viễn Fiơng]] ([[討論‐成員:Congdantoancau|討論]]) 16:32、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT) | |||
=Past Discussion= | |||
{{HideH|Past Discussion}} | |||
* '''丐''' | * '''丐''' | ||
# 丐 [http://goo.gl/d7UB1A] - {{fbu-tn}} {{pp|[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:42 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT)}} | # 丐 [http://goo.gl/d7UB1A] - {{fbu-tn}} {{pp|[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:42 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT)}} | ||
* '''個''' | * '''個'''（亇 个） | ||
# Chinese and Japanese all use 個, it would be better to keep consistent with CJK. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:30 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT) | # Chinese and Japanese all use 個, it would be better to keep consistent with CJK. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:30 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT) | ||
# But in fact I want to use 亇/个. [[成員:Keepout2010|<ruby><rb>杜澎栩</rb><rp>(</rp><rt>Đỗ Bành Hủ</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby>]]（[[討論‐成員:Keepout2010|討論]]） 16:57 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT) | |||
# 個 is a perfect match both semantically and phonetically. There are some varieties of Chinese (such as Teochew) that pronounce this character as /kai/, exactly the same as this word in Vietnamese. 个 would be more suited as a possessive derived from the general measure word, such as in Shanghainese/Wu ''geh''. <span class="autosigned" style="font-size: smaller">——討論𢟚[[威箕𧵑眾碎:𡨸記|記𠸛]]呢羅𧵑[[成員:184.56.161.162|184.56.161.162]]（[[討論‐成員:184.56.161.162|討論]]・[[特別:Contributions/184.56.161.162|㨂給]]）{{#if:03:58、次𠀧、𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2014 (UTC)|𠓨𣅶 03:58、次𠀧、𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2014 (UTC)}}。</span> | |||
{{HideF}} | |||